Exploring relationships between students’ interaction and learning with a haptic virtual biomolecular model

SND-ID: 2024-259. Version: 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5878/b3sh-x287

Citation

Creator/Principal investigator(s)

Konrad Schönborn - Linköping University orcid

Petter Bivall - Linköping University

Lena Tibell - Linköping University orcid

Research principal

Linköping University rorId

Description

This is a narrated video clip demonstrating how PC analysis was performed in the present study. Thr study explored tertiary students’ interaction with a haptic virtual model representing the specific binding of two biomolecules, a core concept in molecular life science education. Twenty students assigned to a haptics (experimental) or no-haptics (control) condition performed a “docking” task where users sought the most favourable position between a ligand and protein molecule, while students’ interactions with the model were logged. Improvement in students’ understanding of biomolecular binding was previously measured by comparing written responses to a target conceptual question before and after interaction with the model. A log-profiling tool visualized students’ movement of the ligand molecule during the docking task. Multivariate parallel coordinate analyses explored any relationships in the entire student data set. The haptics group produced a tighter constellation of collected final docked ligand positions in comparison with no-haptics students, coupled to docking profiles that depicted

... Show more..
This is a narrated video clip demonstrating how PC analysis was performed in the present study. Thr study explored tertiary students’ interaction with a haptic virtual model representing the specific binding of two biomolecules, a core concept in molecular life science education. Twenty students assigned to a haptics (experimental) or no-haptics (control) condition performed a “docking” task where users sought the most favourable position between a ligand and protein molecule, while students’ interactions with the model were logged. Improvement in students’ understanding of biomolecular binding was previously measured by comparing written responses to a target conceptual question before and after interaction with the model. A log-profiling tool visualized students’ movement of the ligand molecule during the docking task. Multivariate parallel coordinate analyses explored any relationships in the entire student data set. The haptics group produced a tighter constellation of collected final docked ligand positions in comparison with no-haptics students, coupled to docking profiles that depicted a more fine-tuned ligand traversal. Students in the no-haptics condition employed double the amount of interactive behaviours concerned with switching between different visual chemical representations offered by the model. In the no-haptics group, this visually intense processing was synonymous with erroneously ‘fitting’ the ligand closer distances to the protein surface. Students who showed higher learning gains tended to engage fewer visual representational switches, and were from the haptics group, while students with a higher spatial ability also engaged fewer visual representational switches, irrespective of assigned condition.

The dataset was originally published in DiVA and moved to SND in 2024. Show less..

Data contains personal data

No

Language

Method and outcome

Data format / data structure

Data collection
Geographic coverage
Administrative information

Identifiers

Topic and keywords

Research area

Didactics (Standard för svensk indelning av forskningsämnen 2011)

Publications

Exploring relationships between students’
interaction and learning with a haptic virtual
biomolecular model
Konrad J. Schönborn, Petter Bivall and Lena A. E. Tibell
Linköping University Post Print
N.B.: When citing this work, cite the original article.
Original Publication:
Konrad J. Schönborn, Petter Bivall and Lena A. E. Tibell, Exploring relationships between
students’ interaction and learning with a haptic virtual biomolecular model, 2011, Computers
and education, (57), 3, 2095-2105.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.013
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-68996
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.013

If you have published anything based on these data, please notify us with a reference to your publication(s). If you are responsible for the catalogue entry, you can update the metadata/data description in DORIS.

Published: 2024-06-27