Personality traits and decision-making styles among Swedish obstetricians and gynaecologists
SND-ID: 2022-57-1. Version: 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5878/xyad-9f70
Citation
Creator/Principal investigator(s)
Gabriel Raoust - Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University
Research principal
Lund University - Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University
Description
The purpose of the research was to: I) compare the personality traits of obstetricians and gynecologists with those of the general population and II) examine the relationship between obstetricians' and gynecologists’ personality traits, cognitive ability, clinical experience, sex and three decision-making styles (Individual, Team and Flow) during obstetric emergencies
The data sheet is comprised of the answers (n = 472, corresponding to a 22% answering rate) to an online questionnaire that was sent out to obstetricians and gynaecologists, members of the Swedish Society for Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The questionnaire included a simplified version of the Five Factor Model questionnaire (IPIP-NEO-30), a spatial ability test (ICAR) and 15 general questions about decision-making during obstetric emergencies relating to three decision-making styles (Individual, Team and Flow).
The dataset is comprised of the answers (n = 472) to the questions in the attached questionnaire: items 1 to 24. The Likert scale was used for most questions, some others had a yes or no type of answer or multiple choice,
The data sheet is comprised of the answers (n = 472, corresponding to a 22% answering rate) to an online questionnaire that was sent out to obstetricians and gynaecologists, members of the Swedish Society for Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The questionnaire included a simplified version of the Five Factor Model questionnaire (IPIP-NEO-30), a spatial ability test (ICAR) and 15 general questions about decision-making during obstetric emergencies relating to three decision-making styles (Individual, Team and Flow).
The dataset is comprised of the answers (n = 472) to the questions in the attached questionnaire: items 1 to 24. The Likert scale was used for most questions, some others had a yes or no type of answer or multiple choice, and a few had a field for free text answering. The answers to question 3, regarding work place location, and the free text answers to question 11, regarding 'motivation of preference', have been removed to assure strict anonymity and avoid any risk of reverse identification. The specific age of respondents 70 years old or older have also been coded to avoid any risk of reverse identification, those individuals being generally quite few in the workplace. For data access to data to specific age of individuals 70 years or older, contact the responsible researcher. Show less..
Data contains personal data
No
Unit of analysis
Population
Obstetricians and gynaecologists, members of the Swedish Society for Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Study design
Cohort study: Prospective
Description of study design
Correlational personality study
Sampling procedure
Time period(s) investigated
2020-10-01 – 2020-11-30
Variables
87
Number of individuals/objects
472
Response rate/participation rate
22%
Data format / data structure
Geographic spread
Geographic location: Sweden
Highest geographic unit
Country
Responsible department/unit
Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University
Contributor(s)
Petri Kajonius - Lund University, Department of Psychology, Lund University
Ethics Review
Lund - Ref. LU 2018/198
Research area
Obstetrics, gynaecology and reproductive medicine (Standard för svensk indelning av forskningsämnen 2011)
Psychology (excluding applied psychology) (Standard för svensk indelning av forskningsämnen 2011)
Psychology (CESSDA Topic Classification)
Keywords
Decision making, Psychology, social, Personality assessment, Psychological tests, Obstetrics, Delivery (pregnancy), Hospital births, Physicians, Social psychology, Personality traits, Emergencies, Obstetrics, Practice patterns, physicians', Physicians, Patient safety, Clinical decision-making