Public acceptance of policy instruments to reduce forest loss: Exploring cross-national variation in East Africa
SND-ID: 2024-446. Version: 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5878/4tag-0221
Is part of collection at SND: Environment for Development
Associated documentation
Citation
Creator/Principal investigator(s)
Aloyce Hepelwa - University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Michael Ndwiga - University of Nairobi, Kenya
Bosco Okumu - African Population and Health Research Centre
Hailemariam Teklewold - Environment and Climate Research Center, Policy Studies Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Peter Babyenda - Makerere University. Kampala, Uganda.
... Show more..Aloyce Hepelwa - University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Michael Ndwiga - University of Nairobi, Kenya
Bosco Okumu - African Population and Health Research Centre
Hailemariam Teklewold - Environment and Climate Research Center, Policy Studies Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Peter Babyenda - Makerere University. Kampala, Uganda.
Matilda Ntiyakunze - Ardhi University, Dar es Salaam
Jesper Stage - Luleå University of Technology
Daniel Slunge - University of Gothenburg, Sweden, Environment for Development
Show less..Research principal
Description
We collected data in five East African countries (Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Ethiopia and Rwanda) focusing on citizens’ perceptions on forest loss-reducing policy instruments along with the role of socio-economic factors on these perceptions. The questionnaire included questions that asked about their opinion about a ban or tax on cutting trees in public and community forests, and a ban or tax on using charcoal. The survey was performed under informed consent. A survey company based in Kenya was recruited to collect the data. The questionnaire was composed in English and then translated into the following languages: Kenya—Swahili and Somali; Tanzania—Swahili; Uganda—Luganda and Runyanoke; Rwanda—Kinyarwanda and French; and Ethiopia—Amharic, Tigrinya, Oromo and Somali. These translations were performed by native-speaking translators recruited by the company. The interviews were conducted by 26 experienced enumerators and 5 supervisors using Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews (CATI), and all responses were recorded with Kobo Toolbox software. Before conducting the interviews, the enumerators c
... Show more..Data contains personal data
Yes
Sensitive personal data
Yes
Type of personal data
Risk of re-identification through socio-demographic variables: country, county, sex, age range, education, salary range
Language
Unit of analysis
Population
Adult population of Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda.
Time Method
Sampling procedure
Time period(s) investigated
2022-03-17 – 2022-03-28
Ethics Review
Ref. 232509
NACOSTI - National Commission For Science, Technology & Innovation. Kenya.
Research area
Economic policy, public expenditure and revenue (CESSDA Topic Classification)
Economics (Standard för svensk indelning av forskningsämnen 2011)
Economic systems and development (CESSDA Topic Classification)
Keywords
Eastern africa, Forest loss, Policy instruments, Public acceptance